dc.contributor
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Psicologia Social
dc.contributor.author
Maestres Useche, Brígida Cristina
dc.date.accessioned
2017-01-20T11:01:26Z
dc.date.available
2017-11-02T06:45:09Z
dc.date.issued
2016-11-02
dc.identifier.isbn
9788449027253
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10803/399326
dc.description.abstract
As from the philosophy in Paul Rincoeur’s text, the system sociology of Niklas
Luhmann and the biopolitic of Michael Focault, we explore the verdict of the
“101/2012” sentence of February 27th; with the objective of identifying
subjects and political voids inherent to its jurisdiction. This is, correlative to the
temporality that outlines the legality, the ordinance and the amnesty, in the legal
reasonings that are exposed in the judgment to resolve the dilemma of
principles, duty to investigate and judicial banning of sanctioning. The
resolution of the dilemma that favors this last one, makes us come face to face
with a paradox of difficult fracture which can be found, according to our point
of view, in the constitutional base of the Spanish contemporary state. But this is
precisely the point at issue that´s open in the debate set out by this investigation,
when framing a question about the function of impunity, precisely from the
former identification of its constitutive subjects. Throughout this work, we’ll
maintain that the effectiveness of the verdict doesn't reside in the deactivation of
the ius punendi but on the activations and/or creations of meaning that unleash
from its emergency. For the time being, voids have been effectively activated
for the legal and political existence and victims get deactivated; simultaneously
allowing us to speculate about the reason of state implied in these operations.
This argument would force to restore the problem to the forum affairs from
which its been expelled, turrning it into a mere issue of victims and family
members, for example, by the Law of the Historical Memory. Consequently,
facing the Francoist matter, the investigation responds with this thesis which
proposes to go further by situating the verdict as a singularity in a broader
network of episodes, in which the victim’s government is an object of
domination. From that point of view, the thesis of reason of state gets
transformed though this channel into biopolitics, in its conjecture, warning us
about its possible absorption/comprehension of the duty of the Spanish
contemporary state. The point of issue for the “us” rises as a final reflection:
Who or what is the “us” of this biopolitic of vulnerability and victimisation?
With this, we possibly find an open road for the matter of state, so prominent in
the political conflict of the Spanish contemporary state.
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.publisher
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
dc.rights.license
L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
*
dc.source
TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
dc.subject
Exceptionaitat
dc.subject
Expecionalidad
dc.subject
Expecptionality
dc.subject.other
Ciències de la Salut
dc.title
El franquismo como actualidad. Reflexiones psicosociológicas para una crónica del nosotros a través de una lectura del tiempo en la STS 101/2012, de 27 de febrero
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.contributor.authoremail
kitinamaestres@hotmail.com
dc.contributor.director
Vázquez Sixto, Félix
dc.contributor.tutor
Muñoz Justicia, Juan
dc.embargo.terms
12 mesos
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess