For Whose Benefit?: A critical analysis of forest carbon offsetting projects and conflict

dc.contributor
Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Ciències Polítiques i Socials
dc.contributor.author
Schmid, Dominique
dc.date.accessioned
2024-02-12T11:59:30Z
dc.date.issued
2023-12-13
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10803/690028
dc.description.abstract
Worldwide, the number of forest carbon offsetting projects has been increasing rapidly over the past decade. Advocates of these projects frame them as a triple-win by allowing continued economic growth for those that purchase the carbon credits generated, enabling socioeconomic development in host countries, while contributing to climate change mitigation. However, this narrative is increasingly contested by academics and environmentalists alike. This thesis contributes to this debate by evaluating how forest carbon offsetting projects can contribute to social conflict in targeted areas. It identifies new mechanisms by which projects can lead to conflict and demonstrates that their impact can go much beyond the community level. First, by exploring the broad effect 22 REDD+ projects in Sub-Saharan Africa have on violent and non-violent conflict, the thesis shows that these projects increase the likelihood of both types of conflict. This impact was not only detected within the project boundaries, but there was also a significant spillover effect. Second, by studying REDD+ projects in the Colombian Amazon, the thesis demonstrates that these projects can lead to internal (non- violent) conflict within and between Indigenous communities. In the sampled communities, the projects led to disputes, internal divisions, and decreasing trust in local leadership as they were closely associated with elite capture. Third, the thesis argues that these projects can also lead to political conflict at the national level in post-conflict countries. Survey evidence collected in Colombia showed that projects that promised socioeconomic benefits were widely supported among the respondents. Projects that included peacebuilding measures, however, were more controversial and the degree to which respondents supported them was influenced by their existing political attitudes. In sum, the thesis provides new evidence about how and to what extent forest carbon offsetting projects can contribute to conflict at the community level and beyond.
ca
dc.format.extent
167 p.
ca
dc.language.iso
eng
ca
dc.publisher
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
dc.rights.license
L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
ca
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
*
dc.source
TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
dc.subject
REDD+
ca
dc.subject
Offsetting
ca
dc.subject
Forest carbon
ca
dc.subject
Forest conservation
ca
dc.subject
Biodiversity conservation
ca
dc.subject
Climate change mitigation
ca
dc.subject
Colombia
ca
dc.subject
Latin America
ca
dc.subject
Sub-Saharan Africa
ca
dc.title
For Whose Benefit?: A critical analysis of forest carbon offsetting projects and conflict
ca
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.subject.udc
32
ca
dc.contributor.authoremail
dominiqueschmid@me.com
ca
dc.contributor.director
Vlaskamp, Martijn C.
dc.contributor.director
Von Haus, Matthias
dc.embargo.terms
24 mesos
ca
dc.date.embargoEnd
2025-12-12T01:00:00Z
dc.rights.accessLevel
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.description.degree
Programa de Doctorat en Ciències Polítiques i Socials


Documentos

Este documento contiene ficheros embargados hasta el dia 12-12-2025

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)